THE BELLUM DEORUM INTERPRETATION
 

WHAT WOULD PART I EXPLAIN?

Well, from my own viewpoint, this is easy. Since I started to view the universe through this lens, it seems as if everything that is (and has ever been) seems to simply fall into place. But please allow me to explain a few of the bigger pieces to elucidate. This will also allow me to explain how this interpretation might be possible within the constraints of reality.
The first scientific mystery that we could easily explain using this theory would be the question of why the quantum realm, and its associated “spookiness” of entanglement, both exist at all: they have logical functions, as that is how each GC performs moves within the construct. Famously,
He clarified however that, “I am not an atheist”, preferring to call himself an agnostic, or a “religious nonbeliever.” Einstein also stated he did not believe in life after death, adding “one life is enough for me.” He was closely involved in his lifetime with several humanist groups.
(an agnostic) Einstein balked at the idea of quantum mechanics’ seeming randomness while replying to fellow physicist
Max Born FRS, FRSE (German pronunciation: [ˈmaks ˈbɔʁn] (listen); 11 December 1882 – 5 January 1970) was a German physicist and mathematician who was instrumental in the development of quantum mechanics. He also made contributions to solid-state physics and optics and supervised the work of a number of notable physicists in the 1920s and 1930s. Born won the 1954 Nobel Prize in Physics for his “fundamental research in quantum mechanics, especially in the statistical interpretation of the wave function”.
Max Born, saying that
It’s true that Einstein had a famous quote about how, “God does not play dice with the Universe.” But arguing against a fundamental randomness inherent to quantum mechanics — which is what the context of that quote was about — is arguing about how to interpret quantum mechanics, not an argument against quantum mechanics itself.

In fact, the nature of Einstein’s argument was that there might be more to the Universe than we can presently observe, and if we could understand the rules we have not yet uncovered, perhaps what appears to be randomness to us here might reveal a deeper, non-random truth. Although this position has not yielded useful results, explorations of the fundamentals of quantum physics continues to be an active area of research, successfully ruling out a number of interpretations involving “hidden variables” present in the Universe.
“God does not play dice with the universe”. For many years, I struggled with Einstein’s statement, because it appeared as if he was so clearly incorrect. Quantum mechanics, and by extension, the
The Standard Model of particle physics is the theory describing three of the four known fundamental forces (electromagnetic, weak and strong interactions — excluding gravity) in the universe and classifying all known elementary particles. It was developed in stages throughout the latter half of the 20th century, through the work of many scientists worldwide, with the current formulation being finalized in the mid-1970s upon experimental confirmation of the existence of quarks. Since then, proof of the top quark (1995), the tau neutrino (2000), and the Higgs boson (2012) have added further credence to the Standard Model. In addition, the Standard Model has predicted various properties of weak neutral currents and the W and Z bosons with great accuracy.
Standard Model, is unbelievably successful at predicting how subatomic particles interact and behave. From our observations until now, the universe is clearly based on randomness and pure chance.
Over time, and with the more I learn, I have come to align with Einstein’s sentiment, because I feel that we all have been missing half the picture. If you can accept that this interpretation could be possible, the quantum effects we know we exist within become an underlying part of our existence and have a defined purpose. Throws of dice transform into moves on a chessboard. The pure chance and randomness that we encounter when we do our best to observe the nearly-infinitesimal structures of our universe become the opposite; what we are witnessing instead is opposing forces attempting to best each other. The issue is that we cannot easily observe or measure the very small effects that occur on the macroscopic level as a result of each instantaneous, electron-scale-interaction. We observe waveforms in a state of superposition simply because the query to determine the state has not yet been performed. The instant an interaction occurs, the query is performed, and a state is chosen!
Second, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle has an important logical purpose within this framework. It means that as either GC selects eigenstates, they cannot back the other GC into a fully deterministic corner and thereby limit the range of possibilities they could select. The more defined a property becomes, the more undefined its complementary property becomes. From this, I posit what I will call the conservation of uncertainty — that the total amount of uncertainty in the universe is conserved, so there is always the same amount available after each move/interaction. I want to be clear that this is a postulate of this theory, not an established law of physics.
The third mystery we might explain is
In theoretical physics, quantum nonlocality refers to the phenomenon by which the measurement statistics of a multipartite quantum system do not admit an interpretation in terms of a local realistic theory. Quantum nonlocality has been experimentally verified under different physical assumptions. Any physical theory that aims at superseding or replacing quantum theory should account for such experiments and therefore cannot fulfill local realism; quantum nonlocality is a property of the universe that is independent of our description of nature.
quantum non-locality, and why the
The field of quantum gravity is actively developing, and theorists are exploring a variety of approaches to the problem of quantum gravity, the most popular being M-theory and loop quantum gravity. All of these approaches aim to describe the quantum behavior of the gravitational field. This does not necessarily include unifying all fundamental interactions into a single mathematical framework. However, many approaches to quantum gravity, such as string theory, try to develop a framework that describes all fundamental forces. Such a theory is often referred to as a theory of everything. Others, such as loop quantum gravity, make no such attempt; instead, they make an effort to quantize the gravitational field while it is kept separate from the other forces.

One of the difficulties of formulating a quantum gravity theory is that direct observation of quantum gravitational effects is thought to only appear at length scales near the Planck scale, around 10−35 meters, a scale far smaller, and hence only accessible with far higher energies, than those currently available in high energy particle accelerators. Therefore, physicists lack experimental data which could distinguish between the competing theories which have been proposed.

Thought experiment approaches have been suggested as a testing tool for quantum gravity theories. In the field of quantum gravity there are several open questions - e.g., it is not known how spin of elementary particles sources gravity, and thought experiments could provide a pathway to explore possible resolutions to these questions, even in the absence of lab experiments or physical observations.
theory of quantum gravity (and by extension, the
A theory of everything (TOE or TOE/ToE), final theory, ultimate theory, unified field theory or master theory is a hypothetical, singular, all-encompassing, coherent theoretical framework of physics that fully explains and links together all aspects of the universe. Finding a theory of everything is one of the major unsolved problems in physics.
theory of everything,) has been so elusive. If the quantum world is an underlying computational structure that projects our macroscopic reality, the relativistic effects of spacetime might only occur at distances past a certain amount of
Since the 1950s, it has been conjectured that quantum fluctuations of the spacetime metric might make the familiar notion of distance inapplicable below the Planck length. This is sometimes expressed by saying that “spacetime becomes a foam at the Planck scale”. It is possible that the Planck length is the shortest physically measurable distance, since any attempt to investigate the possible existence of shorter distances, by performing higher-energy collisions, would result in black hole production. Higher-energy collisions, rather than splitting matter into finer pieces, would simply produce bigger black holes.
Planck lengths. To us, interactions that occur on a quantum level are instantaneous, regardless of your frame of reference, because the quantum world has its own clock, and its version of time that is true time, a “quantum real-time". The classical/relativistic spacetime we observe and exist within is simply an
In computing, an abstraction layer or abstraction level is a way of hiding the working details of a subsystem. Examples of software models that use layers of abstraction include the OSI model for network protocols, OpenGL, and other graphics libraries, which allow the separation of concerns to facilitate interoperability and platform independence.
abstraction layer built upon that. Out of the “four” fundamental forces, gravity is the only one with no confirmed quantum-level description — the other three have well-established quantum field descriptions, while whether gravity is fundamentally quantum at all remains unknown (and I am firmly in the camp that maintains that gravity is not a force at all). This would mean that spacetime and the gravity it causes are emergent properties, as suggested in the 1980’s by
John Archibald Wheeler (July 9, 1911 – April 13, 2008) was an American theoretical physicist. He was largely responsible for reviving interest in general relativity in the United States after World War II. Wheeler also worked with Niels Bohr in explaining the basic principles behind nuclear fission. Together with Gregory Breit, Wheeler developed the concept of the Breit–Wheeler process. He is best known for popularizing the term “black hole,” as to objects with gravitational collapse already predicted during the early 20th century, for inventing the terms “quantum foam”, “neutron moderator”, “wormhole” and “it from bit”, and for hypothesizing the “one-electron universe”. Stephen Hawking referred to him as the “hero of the black hole story”.
John Archibald Wheeler. This aligns with
”It’s almost like the spacetime is a geometrical representation of the entanglement,” says Van Raamsdonk. “Take away all the entanglement and then you just eliminate the spacetime.” Engelhardt agrees. “Entanglement between quantum systems is important for the existence and emergence of spacetime,” she says. The duality suggested that the spacetime of our physical universe might simply be an emergent property of some underlying, entangled part of nature.

Van Raamsdonk credits the AdS/CFT correspondence for making physicists question the very nature of spacetime. If spacetime emerges from the degree and nature of entanglement in a lower-dimensional quantum system, it means that the quantum system is more “real” than the spacetime we live in, in much the same way that a 2-D postcard is more real than the 3-D hologram it creates. “That [space itself and the geometry of space] should have something to do with quantum mechanics is just really shocking,” he says.
holographic theory and findings by Engelhardt et al. and Van Raamsdonk et al., and is
Although string theory and loop quantum gravity both suggest that spacetime is emergent, the kind of emergence is different in the two theories. String theory suggests that spacetime (or at least space) emerges from the behavior of a seemingly unrelated system, in the form of entanglement.
predicted by both
Loop quantum gravity (LQG) is a theory of quantum gravity, which aims to merge quantum mechanics and general relativity, incorporating matter of the Standard Model into the framework established for the pure quantum gravity case. It is an attempt to develop a quantum theory of gravity based directly on Einstein's geometric formulation rather than the treatment of gravity as a force.
loop quantum gravity and
In physics, string theory is a theoretical framework in which the point-like particles of particle physics are replaced by one-dimensional objects called strings. String theory describes how these strings propagate through space and interact with each other. On distance scales larger than the string scale, a string looks just like an ordinary particle, with its mass, charge, and other properties determined by the vibrational state of the string. In string theory, one of the many vibrational states of the string corresponds to the graviton, a quantum mechanical particle that carries the gravitational force. Thus, string theory is a theory of quantum gravity.
string theory, just by different mechanisms.
This theory predicts that spacetime is emergent from, and is a direct function of, quantum uncertainty. That means that gravity emerges from the
confinement of that same uncertainty.
Here lies a gaping hole in this theory
I know I said that this interpretation doesn't require fancy math, but this part certainly will, if it is to ever be proven correct. I do not have the mathematics or physics expertise required to fully describe the next part, so it might sound like complete nonsense if you are a physics major. It is a work in progress, but here goes my attempt at describing how this might work:
Let's start with the assumption that measurement of a quantum system occurs any time a particle interaction occurs. As particles coalesce, they interact more frequently, which reduces the uncertainty of those quantum properties. The more frequently they interact, the further their quantum properties become constrained by the
The quantum Zeno effect (also known as the Turing paradox) is a feature of quantum-mechanical systems allowing a particle's time evolution to be slowed down by measuring it frequently enough with respect to some chosen measurement setting.

Sometimes this effect is interpreted as “a system cannot change while you are watching it”. One can “freeze” the evolution of the system by measuring it frequently enough in its known initial state.
Quantum Zeno effect. If spacetime is a function of uncertainty, then the more defined those quantum properties become, the more curved/warped that spacetime becomes. An extreme expression of this effect occurs within black holes, where the energy and density of particles causes interactions so frequently that it warps spacetime on an immense scale - to the point that all space and time no longer exist at the singularity, where all quantum properties are 100% defined. The ultimate expression of this effect would have been the
The initial singularity is a singularity predicted by some models of the Big Bang theory to have existed before the Big Bang and thought to have contained all the energy and spacetime of the Universe. The instant immediately following the initial singularity is part of the Planck epoch, the earliest period of time in the history of our universe.
initial singularity, in which spacetime would have been "infinitely warped" (meaning, completely non-existent everywhere) due to all energy/matter in the universe having zero uncertainty. The big bang was initiated by the transition of a completely certain, completely defined state to one of very high uncertainty, and thus, spacetime emerged into existence. This theory makes this prediction because without uncertainty, the competition between GCs cannot take place, and the logical reasons for both universes' existence evaporates. Therefore, (if BDI is correct,) uncertainty itself becomes the most foundational building block of the universe, and it would be completely logical that constraining the evolution of that uncertainty would curve and warp the spacetime it creates.
Fourth, we could provide a logical explanation for the
In physical cosmology, the baryon asymmetry problem, also known as the matter asymmetry problem or the matter–antimatter asymmetry problem, is the observed imbalance in baryonic matter (the type of matter experienced in everyday life) and antibaryonic matter in the observable universe. Neither the standard model of particle physics, nor the theory of general relativity provides a known explanation for why this should be so, and it is a natural assumption that the universe is neutral with all conserved charges. The Big Bang should have produced equal amounts of matter and antimatter. Since this does not seem to have been the case, it is likely some physical laws must have acted differently or did not exist for matter and antimatter. Several competing hypotheses exist to explain the imbalance of matter and antimatter that resulted in baryogenesis. However, there is as of yet no consensus theory to explain the phenomenon, which has been described as “one of the great mysteries in physics”.
baryonic asymmetry in our universe. Symmetry is a fundamental law that exists all throughout nature, physics, and mathematics, and it permeates all of quantum theory. Why would we not conclude that logically, the asymmetry that we observe must be balanced somewhere, even if we cannot currently detect it? There was indeed a process that asymmetrically preferred matter to antimatter in our universe, but that asymmetry only exists if you do not consider both OUs as one whole system. That asymmetry is integral to the existence of both. If the matter from either OU were able to cross the temporal boundary separating the two, it would literally be game over for both OUs as they combine and annihilate each other. But, since they are constrained apart from each other by time, they can exist in concert.
The implication of CPT symmetry is that a “mirror-image” of our universe — with all objects having their positions reflected through an arbitrary point (corresponding to a parity inversion), all momenta reversed (corresponding to a time inversion) and with all matter replaced by antimatter (corresponding to a charge inversion) — would evolve under exactly our physical laws. The CPT transformation turns our universe into its “mirror image” and vice versa. CPT symmetry is recognized to be a fundamental property of physical laws.
CPT symmetry states that an OU made of opposite charges (and that runs backwards in time, relative to us) could evolve and exist under the same physical laws as ours. Further, it is predicted that quantum uncertainty would make it such that the mirror universe would
The state of the universe, as it is, does not violate the CPT symmetry, because the Big Bang could be considered as a double sided event, both classically and quantum mechanically, consisting of a universe-antiuniverse pair. This means that this universe is the charge (C), parity (P) and time (T) image of the anti-universe. This pair emerged from the Big Bang epochs not directly into a hot, radiation-dominated era. The antiuniverse would flow back in time from the Big Bang, becoming bigger as it does so, and would be also dominated by antimatter. Its spatial properties are inverted if compared to those in our universe, a situation analogous to creating electron–positron pairs in a vacuum. This model, devised by physicists from the Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics in Canada, proposes that temperature fluctuations in the cosmic microwave background (CMB) are due to the quantum-mechanical nature of space-time near the Big Bang singularity. This means that a point in the future of our universe and a point in the distant past of the antiuniverse would provide fixed classical points, while all possible quantum-based permutations would exist in between. Quantum uncertainty causes the universe and antiuniverse to not be exact mirror images of each other.
not be a perfect copy. This is exactly aligned with what this hypothesis proposes – that since picoseconds after the big bang, each GC started making quantum moves to shape their own universe and sabotage their opponent’s. And, as a matter of sheer coincidence and convenience, such an antiverse might just happen to explain the pesky problem of
However, it provides a natural and straightforward explanation for dark matter. Such a universe-antiuniverse pair would produce large numbers of superheavy neutrinos, also known as sterile neutrinos.
dark matter, one of the largest conundrums in cosmology. CPT symmetry is fundamental to both special relativity and quantum field theory, which both rely on Lorentz symmetry and invariance. If CPT symmetry was shown to ever be violated, physicists would suddenly have a lot of work to do to reformulate both theories.
Fifth, aside from the mathematical convenience of not violating the uncertainty principle,
Vacuum energy is an underlying background energy that exists in space throughout the entire Universe. The vacuum energy is a special case of zero-point energy that relates to the quantum vacuum.
vacuum energy,
Quantum foam or spacetime foam is a theoretical quantum fluctuation of spacetime on very small scales due to quantum mechanics. The theory predicts that at these small scales, particles of matter and antimatter are constantly created and destroyed. These subatomic objects are called virtual particles. The idea was devised by John Wheeler in 1955.
quantum foam and its
A virtual particle is a theoretical transient particle that exhibits some of the characteristics of an ordinary particle, while having its existence limited by the uncertainty principle. The concept of virtual particles arises in the perturbation theory of quantum field theory where interactions between ordinary particles are described in terms of exchanges of virtual particles. A process involving virtual particles can be described by a schematic representation known as a Feynman diagram, in which virtual particles are represented by internal lines.

Virtual particles do not necessarily carry the same mass as the corresponding real particle, although they always conserve energy and momentum. The closer its characteristics come to those of ordinary particles, the longer the virtual particle exists. They are important in the physics of many processes, including particle scattering and Casimir forces. In quantum field theory, forces—such as the electromagnetic repulsion or attraction between two charges—can be thought of as due to the exchange of virtual photons between the charges. Virtual photons are the exchange particle for the electromagnetic interaction.
virtual particles all serve another purpose. They instantaneously pop in and out of existence as the force that makes entanglement and wave function collapse interactions between both OUs possible. Further, this would explain why interactions that involve complex Feynman diagrams (ones with several vertices, signaling more-complex interactions) occur more rarely. Those occurrences mean that the interaction requires a larger amount of improbability. If each GC has a limitation on the complexity of quantum improbability that it can work against within a certain timeframe, they would want to conserve that energy for situations in which they are truly necessary.
Sixth, we will move on to the conservation of information laws in quantum mechanics. This realization was one of the most striking.
Five famous theorems describe the limits on manipulation of quantum information.
  1. no-teleportation theorem, which states that a qubit cannot be (wholly) converted into classical bits; that is, it cannot be fully "read".
  2. no-cloning theorem, which prevents an arbitrary qubit from being copied.
  3. no-deleting theorem, which prevents an arbitrary qubit from being deleted.
  4. no-broadcast theorem, which prevents an arbitrary qubit from being delivered to multiple recipients, although it can be transported from place to place (e.g. via quantum teleportation).
  5. no-hiding theorem, which demonstrates the conservation of quantum information.
These theorems are proven from unitarity, which according to Leonard Susskind is the technical term for the statement that quantum information within the universe is conserved. The five theorems open up possibilities in quantum information processing.
Unitarity (video), conservation of information, and the
Physics relies on conservation laws, which govern how energy and information can change within a system. The conservation of energy states that the total amount of energy in a closed system (like the universe) must stay constant. In classical physics, information can be copied and deleted, but in quantum mechanics, the conservation of quantum information means that information cannot be created or destroyed. This is demonstrated by the no-cloning and no-deleting theorems. The no-hiding theorem further shows that the wave function, which contains all relevant information about a physical system, is conserved as it moves from one Hilbert space to another during unitary time evolution. The conservation of entropy in quantum systems also suggests that information is conserved, as quantum states and mixed states (a combination of quantum states) remain unchanged during unitary evolution.
no-hiding theorem serve hugely important logical roles, aside from simply preserving quantum field theory. If these concepts are not violated, that makes the data within both OUs analogous to the most massive
A blockchain is a distributed ledger with growing lists of records (blocks) that are securely linked together via cryptographic hashes. Each block contains a cryptographic hash of the previous block, a timestamp, and transaction data (generally represented as a Merkle tree, where data nodes are represented by leaves). The timestamp proves that the transaction data existed when the block was created. Since each block contains information about the previous block, they effectively form a chain (compare linked list data structure), with each additional block linking to the ones before it. Consequently, blockchain transactions are irreversible in that, once they are recorded, the data in any given block cannot be altered retroactively without altering all subsequent blocks.
blockchain ledger imaginable. Unitarity stipulates that at the quantum level, no two possible pasts could lead to the same future outcome. Meaning, whatever state the universe is in at this moment, it is only because innumerable quantum interactions have built upon one another and have brought us to this specific moment with this specific outcome. And, because of conservation of information, every interaction could be played in reverse with complete precision. All of this is to say that if either GC tried to violate the laws of physics by manipulating even a single property of a single particle, without completely reversing time and starting over from that change forward, the mathematics and physics of the entire system would be violated. Cheating would cause our reality to literally rip apart!
Proceeding on with the topic of mathematics, complex numbers, including the “imaginary” number i would become absolutely real, even when dealing with 2-D geometry. That “negative area” can describe a physical place in geometry and 4-D spacetime: the antiverse. Rotations around the
In mathematics, the complex plane is the plane formed by the complex numbers, with a Cartesian coordinate system such that the x-axis, called the real axis, is formed by the real numbers, and the y-axis, called the imaginary axis, is formed by the imaginary numbers.
complex plane allow us to rotate through the
In the simple case n = 1, the group U(1) corresponds to the circle group, consisting of all complex numbers with absolute value 1, under multiplication. All the unitary groups contain copies of this group.
U(1) symmetry between the OUs. This is why i exists in the Schrödinger equation and in the Standard Model equations! Both equations give us two solutions – one that applies to our proverse, but also one that applies to the antiverse. If correct, this suggests that complex numbers, in and of themselves, are a mathematical clue to the nature of our dualistic universe. In the same way that Paul Dirac was able to
The modern theory of antimatter began in 1928, with a paper by Paul Dirac. Dirac realised that his relativistic version of the Schrödinger wave equation for electrons predicted the possibility of antielectrons. These were discovered by Carl D. Anderson in 1932 and named positrons from “positive electron”. Although Dirac did not himself use the term antimatter, its use follows on naturally enough from antielectrons, antiprotons, etc. A complete periodic table of antimatter was envisaged by Charles Janet in 1929.

The Feynman–Stueckelberg interpretation states that antimatter and antiparticles are regular particles traveling backward in time.
predict the existence of antimatter when he formed his namesake equation, I believe Schrödinger’s implementation of i predicts completely real solutions to the equation that apply to the antiverse.
Next, answering the questions of why the
The anthropic principle, also known as the “observation selection effect”, is the hypothesis, first proposed in 1957 by Robert Dicke, that there is a restrictive lower bound on how statistically probable our observations of the universe are, because observations could only happen in a universe capable of developing intelligent life. Proponents of the anthropic principle argue that it explains why this universe has the age and the fundamental physical constants necessary to accommodate conscious life, since if either had been different, we would not have been around to make observations. Anthropic reasoning is often used to deal with the notion that the universe seems to be finely tuned for the existence of life.
anthropic principle seems to exist becomes child’s play. It is yet another feature of our reality that serves a logical function under this interpretation. The reason it appears we were born into a
The characterization of the universe as finely tuned suggests that the occurrence of life in the universe is very sensitive to the values of certain fundamental physical constants and that the observed values are, for some reason, improbable. If the values of any of certain free parameters in contemporary physical theories had differed only slightly from those observed, the evolution of the universe would have proceeded very differently and life as it is understood may not have been possible.
fine-tuned universe becomes evident: we are! If the objective of the competition is to expand consciousness as far and wide as possible, there are obvious and plain explanations for why our universe would have conditions favorable to our existence, including values fundamental to the evolution of life such as the
In physics, the fine-structure constant, also known as the Sommerfeld constant, commonly denoted by α (the Greek letter alpha), is a fundamental physical constant which quantifies the strength of the electromagnetic interaction between elementary charged particles.
[...]
The anthropic principle is an argument about the reason the fine-structure constant has the value it does: stable matter, and therefore life and intelligent beings, could not exist if its value were very different. α needs to be between around 1/180 and 1/85 to have proton decay to be slow enough for life to be possible.
fine structure constant. Even (an atheist) Stephen Hawking, said "[t]he laws of science, as we know them at present, contain many fundamental numbers, like the size of the electric charge of the electron and the ratio of the masses of the proton and the electron. […] The remarkable fact is that the values of these numbers seem to have been very finely adjusted to make possible the development of life." We can also inherently assume that
Intelligent design (ID) is a pseudoscientific argument for the existence of God, presented by its proponents as “an evidence-based scientific theory about life''s origins”. Proponents claim that “certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.”
intelligent design is in play, and the PGC has done their best to ensure we are as good as they could make us, despite the obstacles the AGC has put in their way.
Another fundamental feature of our reality we can ascribe another logical function to under these assumptions would be the universal speed limit, c, and the restrictions of locality and relativity exist. We know that speed limit establishes causality and is an essential part of our reality. However, if the entire goal of the competition is to determine which GC can create the most conscious life in their OU, then being able to transmit any information (whether that’s matter, or just plain data) quickly across a large region of space would create an issue. It would allow one civilization that has figured out “the truth” to easily broadcast a huge spoiler to the rest of the cosmos. Imposing a speed limit by making it impossible (or incredibly difficult) to transmit data quickly across the relatively vast emptiness of space means that you are limiting how fast one global civilization can ruin the plot for others, and forces (most of) them to figure “the truth” out for themselves.
Last, and perhaps most importantly: If BDI does describe the nature of our universe, the
The Fermi paradox is the discrepancy between the lack of conclusive evidence of advanced extraterrestrial life compared to the apparently high a priori likelihood of its existence. As a 2015 article put it, “If life is so easy, someone from somewhere must have come calling by now.”
Fermi Paradox and the
The Great Filter is one possible resolution of the Fermi paradox. It posits that in the development of life from the earliest stages of abiogenesis to reaching the highest levels of development on the Kardashev scale, there exists some particular barrier to development that makes detectable extraterrestrial life exceedingly rare.
Great Filter are the results of one of two possibilities, or a combination thereof: either the AGC’s successful
Most of the alien civilizations that ever dotted our galaxy have probably killed themselves off already.

That's the takeaway of a new study, published Dec. 14 to the arXiv database, which used modern astronomy and statistical modeling to map the emergence and death of intelligent life in time and space across the Milky Way. Their results amount to a more precise 2020 update of a famous equation that Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence founder Frank Drake wrote in 1961. The Drake equation, popularized by physicist Carl Sagan in his “Cosmos” miniseries, relied on a number of mystery variables — like the prevalence of planets in the universe, then an open question.

This new paper, authored by three Caltech physicists and one high school student, is much more practical. It says where and when life is most likely to occur in the Milky Way, and identifies the most important factor affecting its prevalence: intelligent creatures' tendency toward self-annihilation.
destructive actions to prevent consciousness from expanding and thriving throughout our universe, or the fact that an advanced alien civilization would have no interest in contacting us unless it is obvious that we understand and agree on “the truth”.

POTENTIAL LINKS

Touching back on the concept of complex numbers referencing the antiverse, there might also be a correlation to why the Hermitian conjugate terms exist in the Standard Model equation. I have not found a good explanation regarding this – however, since our universe is only half of the full picture, we may need to subtract those complex values to match our experimental results.
The principles of this theory might have a link to the reason fermions have a
All known fermions, the particles that constitute ordinary matter, have a spin of ½. The spin number describes how many symmetrical facets a particle has in one full rotation; a spin of ½ means that the particle must be rotated by two full turns (through 720°) before it has the same configuration as when it started.
spin of ½, meaning that it takes two full “rotations” of a particle to return to its starting point. I understand that this is related to why the
In quantum mechanics, the Pauli exclusion principle states that two or more identical particles with half-integer spins (i.e. fermions) cannot occupy the same quantum state within a quantum system simultaneously. This principle was formulated by Austrian physicist Wolfgang Pauli in 1925 for electrons, and later extended to all fermions with his spin–statistics theorem of 1940.
Pauli exclusion principle exists and how that property allows matter to exist. However, I do wonder if the extra spin could also be related to how cross-OU entanglement and interactions occur. Recent collider
The new scrutiny picked up a background blur in the images that had escaped past researchers. In relatively soft collisions just barely breaking the proton open, most of the momentum was locked up in the usual three quarks: two ups and a down. But a small amount of momentum appeared to come from a “charm” quark and charm antiquark — colossal elementary particles that each outweigh the entire proton by more than one-third.
experiments have found that under certain conditions, an extra charm quark–antiquark pair can sometimes appear when you destroy a proton. The strangest part of these findings: the charm quark and antiquark that are observed are each heavier than the entire proton they came from!
Copyright © 2023 - 2026 Bellum Deorum Foundation, LLC.
Wait, what are you selling?