INTRODUCTION
First off, I’d like to start with a TRIGGER WARNING. I will be talking about
religion. If something comes across as sarcastic, please accept that it is just my version of
humor. It is truly not my intention to offend anyone. I believe almost every major religion on
Earth owns a portion of “the truth”. That said, there are some elements of religious books and
teachings that run in direct conflict with what this theory predicts to be “the truth”, and I will
be addressing a few of those conflicts.
Next, I must warn that in order to understand the contents of this theory, you must understand, at
an introductory level, two scientific concepts that seem extremely bizarre to many when they first
learn about them: relativity and quantum theory. If you know nothing about these concepts, you can follow these links. Yes, I realize there are
a lot of videos and it will take you a little while to get through them. If you are starting from
zero and wish to truly understand reality, you must do the work and educate yourself! Also, if
your worldview causes you to refuse to accept basic scientific truths, such as the theory of evolution, big bang cosmology, and anthropogenic climate change, I doubt there is any chance your worldview could be changed. There are so many volumes of
overwhelming scientific evidence for these theories that it would be nearly inconceivable that any
of them could be proven incorrect. With that said, this theory does align with intelligent design.
YouTube > Intro to General Realtivity Learning Playlist (PBS Spacetime)
YouTube > Intro to Quantum Theory Learning Playlist (PBS Spacetime)
The change in heritable characteristics of biological populations over successive generations.
(Click for more info.)
A physical theory that describes how the universe expanded from an initial state of high density and temperature.
(Click for more info.)
The ongoing increase in global average temperature, primarily caused by humans burning fossil fuels.
(Click for more info.)
An argument for the existence of God which claims that certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause.
(Click for more info.)
The next warning is this: The ideas herein are unorthodox, but I feel their novelty makes them
worth considering. In order to fully understand the theory and the reasoning that led me here, you
will likely need to read this theory in its entirety, as well as follow the links presented (if
you lack understanding of a concept). I realize there are links everywhere. That is
because I don't want to assume any reader's education level or familiarity with physics, and also
to provide reference and support for the ideas presented.
Unfortunately, all the links might make this site feel a little like this.
I composed this (first) version in a very non-academic manner, as I feel these ideas can reach a
much wider audience in this format. If this theory is not disproven immediately, an academic
version will be written in due course; for now, I feel it important that these ideas are
digestible by as many people and as quickly as possible, for reasons I shall discuss. This
interpretation is broken into two parts. The first has much more scientific ground to stand on,
and I am highly confident that it could explain our universe. Part II currently has less evidence
to stand on and is, admittedly, more of my own intuition.
If you have studied physics, you might be familiar with works classified as quantum mysticism or “quantum quackery”, such as works by Dr. David Bohm or Sir Roger Penrose. I understand that this interpretation, and specifically Part II, will almost certainly end up
regarded likewise (at least initially). I knew that both men had made significant contributions to
the field of physics. However, I only learned about their viewpoints on how the quantum world
relates to consciousness after I began forming this theory. I believe they were on the right
track and, further, that these two brilliant men's contributions are being wrongfully dismissed. I
want to be clear: compared to these two, I am no more than a 1950s toddler pointing at a globe, excited
that South America and Africa look as if they could fit together.
Criticized by experts to be pseudoscience or quackery, a set of metaphysical beliefs and practices that seek to relate consciousness, intelligence, spirituality, or mystical worldviews to quantum mechanics.
(Click for more info.)
Was an American-Brazilian-British scientist who has been described as one of the most significant theoretical physicists of the 20th century and who contributed unorthodox ideas to quantum theory, neuropsychology and the philosophy of mind.
(Click for more info.)
Is a British mathematician, mathematical physicist, philosopher of science and Nobel Laureate in Physics, and is regarded as one of the greatest living physicists.
(Click for more info.)
This theory is closest to an objective collapse theory, meaning wave function collapse occurs any time a particle interaction occurs, whether or not a
conscious being (in the universe) is observing. I tend to side with Einstein when he said, “I like
to think the moon is there even if I am not looking at it.”
Proposed solutions to measurement in quantum mechanics regarding how the classical world emerges from quantum theory.
(Click for more info.)