THE BELLUM DEORUM INTERPRETATION
 

INTRODUCTION

First off, I’d like to start with a TRIGGER WARNING. I will be talking about religion. If something comes across as sarcastic, please accept that it is just my version of humor. It is truly not my intention to offend anyone. I believe almost every major religion on Earth owns a portion of “the truth”. That said, there are some elements of religious books and teachings that run in direct conflict with what this theory predicts to be “the truth”, and I will be addressing a few of those conflicts.
Next, I must warn that in order to understand the contents of this theory, you must understand, at an introductory level, two scientific concepts that seem extremely bizarre to many when they first learn about them:

From YouTube > Intro to General Relativity Learning Playlist (PBS Spacetime):

 relativity and

From YouTube > Intro to Quantum Theory Learning Playlist (PBS Spacetime):

 quantum theory. If you know nothing about these concepts, you can follow these links. Yes, I realize there are a lot of videos and it will take you a little while to get through them. If you are starting from zero and wish to truly understand reality, you must do the work and educate yourself! Also, if your worldview causes you to refuse to accept basic scientific truths, such as the

From Wikipedia > Evolution:

In biology, evolution is the change in heritable characteristics of biological populations over successive generations. These characteristics are the expressions of genes, which are passed on from parent to offspring during reproduction.
 theory of evolution,

From Wikipedia > Big Bang:

The Big Bang event is a physical theory that describes how the universe expanded from an initial state of high density and temperature. Various cosmological models of the Big Bang explain the evolution of the observable universe from the earliest known periods through its subsequent large-scale form.
 big bang cosmology, and anthropogenic

From Wikipedia > Climate Change:

In common usage, climate change describes global warming—the ongoing increase in global average temperature—and its effects on Earth's climate system. Climate change in a broader sense also includes previous long-term changes to Earth's climate. The current rise in global average temperature is more rapid than previous changes, and is primarily caused by humans burning fossil fuels.
 climate change, I doubt there is any chance your worldview could be changed. There are so many volumes of overwhelming scientific evidence for these theories that it would be nearly inconceivable that any of them could be proven incorrect. With that said, this theory does align with

From Wikipedia > Intelligent design:

Intelligent design (ID) is a pseudoscientific argument for the existence of God, presented by its proponents as “an evidence-based scientific theory about life''s origins”. Proponents claim that “certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.”
 intelligent design.
The next warning is this: The ideas herein are unorthodox, but I feel their novelty makes them worth considering. In order to fully understand the theory and the reasoning that led me here, you will likely need to read this theory in its entirety, as well as follow the links presented (if you lack understanding of a concept). I realize there are links everywhere. That is because I don't want to assume any reader's education level or familiarity with physics, and also to provide reference and support for the ideas presented.
Pepe Silva meme
Unfortunately, all the links might make this site feel a little like this.
I composed this (first) version in a very non-academic manner, as I feel these ideas can reach a much wider audience in this format. If this theory is not disproven immediately, an academic version will be written in due course; for now, I feel it important that these ideas are digestible by as many people and as quickly as possible, for reasons I shall discuss. This interpretation is broken into two parts. The first has much more scientific ground to stand on, and I am highly confident that it could explain our universe. Part II currently has less evidence to stand on and is, admittedly, more of my own intuition.
If you have studied physics, you might be familiar with works classified as

From Wikipedia > Quantum mysticism:

Quantum mysticism, sometimes referred pejoratively to as quantum quackery or quantum woo, is a set of metaphysical beliefs and associated practices that seek to relate consciousness, intelligence, spirituality, or mystical worldviews to the ideas of quantum mechanics and its interpretations. Quantum mysticism is criticized by non-believers with expert knowledge of quantum mechanics to be pseudoscience or quackery.
 quantum mysticism or “quantum quackery”, such as works by

From Wikipedia > David Bohm:

David Joseph Bohm FRS (/boʊm/; 20 December 1917 – 27 October 1992) was an American-Brazilian-British scientist who has been described as one of the most significant theoretical physicists of the 20th century and who contributed unorthodox ideas to quantum theory, neuropsychology and the philosophy of mind. Among his many contributions to physics is his causal and deterministic interpretation of quantum theory, now known as De Broglie–Bohm theory.
 Dr. David Bohm or
Sir Roger Penrose OM FRS HonFInstP (born 8 August 1931) is a British mathematician, mathematical physicist, philosopher of science and Nobel Laureate in Physics. He is Emeritus Rouse Ball Professor of Mathematics in the University of Oxford, an emeritus fellow of Wadham College, Oxford, and an honorary fellow of St John's College, Cambridge and University College London.

Penrose has contributed to the mathematical physics of general relativity and cosmology. He has received several prizes and awards, including the 1988 Wolf Prize in Physics, which he shared with Stephen Hawking for the Penrose–Hawking singularity theorems, and the 2020 Nobel Prize in Physics “for the discovery that black hole formation is a robust prediction of the general theory of relativity”. He is regarded as one of the greatest living physicists, mathematicians and scientists, and is particularly noted for the breadth and depth of his work in both natural and formal sciences.

From Wikipedia > Roger Penrose:

 Sir Roger Penrose. I understand that this interpretation, and specifically Part II, will almost certainly end up regarded likewise (at least initially). I knew that both men had made significant contributions to the field of physics. However, I only learned about their viewpoints on how the quantum world relates to consciousness after I began forming this theory. I believe they were on the right track and, further, that these two brilliant men's contributions are being wrongfully dismissed. I want to be clear: compared to these two, I am no more than a 1950s toddler pointing at a globe, excited that South America and Africa look as if they could fit together.
This theory is closest to an

From Wikipedia > Objective-collapse theory:

Objective-collapse theories, also known as models of spontaneous wave function collapse or dynamical reduction models, are proposed solutions to the measurement problem in quantum mechanics. As with other theories called interpretations of quantum mechanics, they are possible explanations of why and how quantum measurements always give definite outcomes, not a superposition of them as predicted by the Schrödinger equation, and more generally how the classical world emerges from quantum theory. The fundamental idea is that the unitary evolution of the wave function describing the state of a quantum system is approximate. It works well for microscopic systems, but progressively loses its validity when the mass / complexity of the system increases.
 objective collapse theory, meaning wave function collapse occurs any time a particle interaction occurs, whether or not a conscious being (in the universe) is observing. I tend to side with Einstein when he said, “I like to think the moon is there even if I am not looking at it.”
Copyright © 2023 - 2026 Bellum Deorum Foundation, LLC.
Wait, what are you selling?